“…Galileo was one of the most original and creative geniuses of all
time. The consequences of his work for man’s understanding of the
world, and hence for human thought processes, is beyond all
calculation.”[i]
This assessment of Galileo, captures the greatness and worth of this
brilliant Italian scientist called by many the Father of Modern
Science. Yet this towering figure did not always enjoy
GOD SEEN THROUGH THE EYES OF
THE GREATEST MIND
"This
book is intriguing, fascinating, revealing and energizing."
(Beacon Hill Excerpts)
Most of the greatest
minds of the past believed in God. (Click on picture for more
information)
Angel Award
winner
Silver
Medal co-winner (ECPA)
|
this
kind of glowing assessment by the powers of his day. In fact, toward
the end of his life, Galileo incurred at first the displeasure and
finally the wrath of the Catholic hierarchy, who in those days had
control over people’s lives.
Copernicus was the source of Galileo’s difficulties. His
revolutionary idea that the earth rotated around the sun convinced
Galileo that the then-accepted view that
the earth was the centre of the universe was incorrect. His
scientific observations of the moon and the planets further
convinced Galileo that Copernicus was indeed correct.
In his excitement for the newfound scientific
truth, Galileo travelled to Rome to attempt to convince the church
authorities of his conclusions. In Rome he was confronted by none
other than Cardinal Bellarmine, the defender of Catholic Dogma, who
was not convinced by Galileo’s arguments. In fact,
Bellarmine instead became concerned that the Galilean views were
potentially dangerous to Catholicism. Consequently, Galileo was
warned to treat his ideas as a hypothesis
and not as fact. Galileo went back to Florence discouraged but not
defeated.
Years later, Galileo was buoyed by the death of the Pope, and the
fact that his replacement was one of his long-time supporters, who
came to be known as Pope Urban VIII. Convinced that this Pope would
be much more willing to accept his views, Galileo asked and received
an audience with him with whom he had a transparent exchange about
his theory. The Pope also presented his views against the
heliocentric views and did so clearly and cogently. Galileo listened
and stored the Pope’s arguments in his mental bank. Later on, when
he wrote his master work, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World
Systems, Galileo inserted them “…into the mouth of a
thick-headed character…And the pope’s arguments would be ridiculed.”
Unfortunately for Galileo, “Urban, too, would remember the arguments
he made. Their rough handling later did not amuse him. In some ways
this is the key to the fate of Galileo.[ii]
Pope
Urban thus decreed that the book and Galileo’s ideas were to be
declared “anathema,” and that Galileo was to be severely
consequenced for not heeding Bellarmine’s warnings. Though some
feared for Galileo’s life, or a possible life-long imprisonment in
the dark dungeons of Castel Sant’Angelo, mercy prevailed, and he was
given house arrest for the rest of his life. Before the sentencing,
though, Galileo had to abjure his views openly by signing a document
composed and approved by the inquisitory body, which read as
follows:
“I
desire to remove from the minds of Your eminences and of all
faithful Christians this strong suspicion of heresy. With sincere
heart and unfeigned faith, I abjure, curse and detest my errors. I
swear that in the future, I will never again say or assert, verbally
or in writing , anything to encourage this suspicion….Should I know
any heretic or person suspected of heresy, I shall denounce him in
the Sacred Canons.”[iii]
Later on
Galileo, being the stubborn man that he was, found a way to send his
work to the Protestant North and to have it published for the
benefit of more willing and objective ears. The rest is history. His
views were validated by countless others, and they finally
prevailed.
Galileo’s trial and condemnation became “…one of the defining
narratives of modern western civilization,”[iv]
for it “…presents in a microcosm the issues that define the most
portentous turning point of the second millennium, the transition
from the Age of Faith to the Age of Reason—from an era of religion
and spirituality to an epoch of science and materialism.”[v]
Galileo
ended his life feeling abandoned by men. He felt misunderstood by
the leadership of a Church he loved until
his death. No doubt resentment at times filled his mind toward some
humans in high places. Nonetheless, his moments of bitterness toward
men never clouded his faith in the Scriptures and in God.
The
Holy Scriptures, to Galileo were divinely
inspired and inerrant, though humans can misinterpret their true
meaning. “…the Holy Scriptures cannot err
and the decrees therein contained are absolutely true and
inviolable. I should have added that, though scripture cannot err
its expounders and interpreters are liable to err in many ways …when
they base themselves always on literal meaning of the words.”[vi]
At times the Bible uses figures of speech to
simplify concepts which “…had been inserted into the Bible for the
sake of the masses, Galileo insisted, to aid their understanding of
matters pertaining to their salvation. In the same way, biblical
language had also simplified certain physical effects in Nature, to
conform to common experience.”[vii]
Galileo saw both the truths of Scriptures and the truths of nature
as having been derived from the same source: God; therefore, one
could not contradict the other. “Holy Scripture and nature, are both
emanations from the divine word: the former dictated by the Holy
Spirit, the latter the observant executrix of God’s commands.” Thus,
“…no truth discovered in Nature could contradict the deep truth of
the Holy Writ.”
[viii] Furthermore,
Galileo held that the primary aim of Scriptures was not to reveal
scientific truths but “…to worship God and save souls.[ix]
The
proper understanding of Scriptures required proper illumination from
God, thus Galileo turned to God in prayer for the ability to
understand the spiritual truths of the Bible.
“I trust the infinite goodness of God may direct toward the
purity of my mind a small amount of His grace that I may understand
the meaning of His words.”[x]
The
human mind was according to Galileo one the greatest of God’s
achievements. “ When I consider what
marvellous things men have understood, what he has inquired into and
contrived, I know only too clearly that the human mind is a work of
God, and one of the most excellent.” Yet the potential of the
human mind “. . . is separated from the Divine knowledge by an
infinite interval.”
[xi]
In His mercy, God, on
occasion, chooses to reveal a new insight to someone He chooses,
thus augmenting the knowledge revealed to humanity. “One must not
doubt the possibility that the Divine Goodness at times may choose
to inspire a ray of His immense knowledge in low and high
intellects, when they are adorned with sincere and holy zeal.”[xii]
Galileo saw himself as the recipient of some such great truths and
expressed gratitude to God for being the first to have the
revelation. “I
render infinite thanks to God, for being so kind as to make me alone
the first observer of marvels kept hidden in obscurity for all
previous centuries.”[xiii]
He often mused on what he
saw as the stunning manifestations of God’s creative wisdom as with
birds and their ideal design for flight and fish and their perfect
design for swimming in water:
“God could have made
birds with bones of massive gold, with veins full of molten silver,
with flesh heavier than lead and with tiny wings . . . He could have
made fish heavier than lead, and thus twelve times heavier than
water, but He has wished to make the former of bone, flesh, and
feathers that are light enough, and the latter as heavier than
water, to teach us that He rejoices in simplicity and facility.”[xiv]
His observations and
meditations on God’s wonders led him to the following conclusion:
“To me the works of nature and of God are miraculous.”[xv]
In his later years Galileo
had to confront the deterioration of his vigor and vitality and the
loss of health and his eyesight. But his worst and most painful loss
was the loss of his beloved daughter, Maria Celeste, who had been
this greatest comfort and solace throughout his most difficult and
trying years. In spite of all his tribulations, his faith in God
remained firm and unshakeable. Galileo believed strongly that all
human suffering had meaning and had to be welcomed with courage and
resignation, knowing that God allows all for the benefit of
believers.
“Whatever the course of our lives, we should receive them as the
highest gift from the hand of God, in which equally reposed the
power to do nothing whatever for us. Indeed, we should accept
misfortune not only in thanks, but in infinite gratitude to
Providence, which by such means detaches us from an excessive love
of Earthly things and elevates our minds to the celestial and
divine.”[xvi]
To
the end God remained Galileo’s source of strength and “…the source
of all good.”[xvii]
No persecution; no loss; no illness took Galileo’s faith away from
him until the end. His unshakeable faith is eloquently summarized in
the following statement written at the end of his life journey:
“To the Lord; whom I worship and
thank;
That governs the heavens with His
eyelid
To Him I return tired,
but full of living.”
[xviii]
MICHAEL CAPUTO
AUTHOR'S BOOKS
Author of the award-winning book
GOD SEEN THROUGH THE EYES OF THE GREATEST
MINDS, (Howard Publishing)
WORKS CITED
[i]
Magee Bryan, The Story of Philosophy.
New York: DK Publishing, Inc., 2001, 67.
[ii]
Reston, James, Galileo: A life. New
York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1994, 195.
[iv]
Rowland, Wade, Galileo’s Mistake: The
Archeology of a Myth. Toronto: Thomas Allen Publishers,
2001, 1.
[vi]
Sobel, Dava, Galileo’s Daughter: A
Historical Memoir of Science, Faith, and Love. Toronto:
Viking Press, 1999, 63.
[ix]
Reston, op. cit., 137.
[x]
Chiari, A.
Galileo Galilei, Scritti Letterari.
Florence: Felice Le Monnier, 1970,
550.
[xi]
Poupard, Cardinal
Paul. Galileo Galilei.
Pittsburgh: Duquesne University
Press, 1983, 101.
[xii]
Chiari,
op. cit., 545.
[xv]
Brunetti, F.
Opere di Galileo Galilei. Torino: Unione
Tipografico-Editrice Torinese, 1964, 506.
[xvi]
Sobel, op. cit., 12.
|